Lecture Notes 15
Lecture 15 - Linearization
Now that we've derived nonlinear models based on material and energy balances, we need to get them into a form for linear systems analysis. We do this through a process called linearization. In Lecture 15, we review the mathematics of how to linearize a nonlinear function. We have a couple exercises to help practice the linearization process.
Linear vs. Nonlinear Models: CSTR Case Study
Linear vs. Nonlinear Models: Gravity Drained Tank Case Study
We previously ran through an example of a gravity drained tank.

Fig 1: Diagram of the Gravity Drained Tank

Fig 2: Sequence of Valve Movements to Test Models
We derived a FOPDT model of the process using empirical fitting techniques. A first principles approach was also used to obtain a model from a material balance. A comparison of the two models is shown below:

Fig 3: Linear Model (FOPDT). The linear response is easy to fit to the data but deviates, especially during the periods that are far from the steady state values.

Fig 4: Nonlinear Model Based on a Material Balance. The nonlinear response is valid over a wider range of operation.
Discussion Questions
Test the lecture's ideas before or after class - commit to an answer first, then check it with a classmate or an AI tutor.
- A student linearizes the CSTR model around a point that is not a steady state of the nonlinear equations. What specific term fails to vanish, and what nonsense does the resulting "linear model" predict at zero input?
- The linearized gravity-drained tank model and the nonlinear model agree for a 2% valve step but diverge badly for a 30% step. Explain, using the Taylor series, exactly what was thrown away and why the error grows with step size.
- Why do the deviation variables matter? What goes wrong if you drop the primes and treat the linear model as relating absolute temperature to absolute flow?
- Control design almost always starts from a linear model even though every real process is nonlinear. Give two practical reasons this is defensible, and one situation from the CSTR case study where it is not.
App: The Stirred Reactor Control Studio runs the full nonlinear exothermic CSTR - move the operating point and watch the effective process gain change, which is exactly the behavior a single linearization cannot capture.
